
This weekend I was at Cadwell Park in Lincolnshire. The venue was host to the biggest motorsport property in the UK, the British Superbikes (BSB). The event was different, because as well as being supported by other motorbike classes, BSB hosted the Trofeo Abarth 500 GB, a new one-make car series. It could have all [...]






Hi,
Very interesting post.
I would just add that people shouldn’t be forced to follow someone who decides to follow them.
Each one of us has different interest domains and objectives while using twitter. I decided to follow you as I’m involved with sponsoring in motor sports but I never posted anything about it on tweeter so it would be useless for you to follow me (I personnaly avoid overspamming my tweeter account).
Cheers,
RR
All great points, and I seem to have a relatively similar approach though admittedly getting over 100+ a day it’s tough so synthesize just what you’ll be getting. a lot of times I’ll take a quick glance and make the decision. I’m lean on lenient at first and then if I get bombarded by a bad grouping of tweets I might unfollow later.
I think the main thing is that everyone uses the tool differently, and we should do what works best for us. Sharing that makes sense, b/c what we do might work for those who have a similar disposition, but there’s not right or wrong way.
Follow back everyone who follows you? Follow only the people who provide you immense value? I don’t know what the answer is. I probably follow a few more than I would like, but it just seems like the courteous thing to do. I certainly don’t gauge social capital on the # of Twitter followers, but part of my job is often getting out messaging for a client. Having more followers means potentially having more reach. That’s something I have to keep in mind every time I think about pruning my followers down to < 500.
Thought this was a good post that provides your new followers potentially landing here good insight into your approach and who you are.
All the best!
Ryan